Current:Home > MyPennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says -SecurePath Capital
Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says
View
Date:2025-04-27 12:25:02
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A requirement for Pennsylvania voters to put accurate handwritten dates on the outside envelopes of their mail-in ballots does not run afoul of a civil rights law, a federal appeals court panel said Wednesday, overturning a lower court ruling.
A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to uphold enforcement of the required date on return envelopes, a technical mandate that caused thousands of votes to be declared invalid in the 2022 election.
The total number is a small fraction of the large state’s electorate, but the court’s ruling puts additional attention on Pennsylvania’s election procedures ahead of a presidential election in which its Electoral College votes are up for grabs.
A lower court judge had ruled in November that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if they are received in time. U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter said the envelope date is irrelevant in helping elections officials decide whether a ballot was received in time or if a voter is qualified.
In the court’s opinion, Judge Thomas Ambro said the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that the lower court relied upon does not pertain to ballot-casting rules broadly, such as dates on envelopes, but “is concerned only with the process of determining a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot.”
“The Pennsylvania General Assembly has decided that mail-in voters must date the declaration on the return envelope of their ballot to make their vote effective,” Ambro wrote. “The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously held this ballot-casting rule is mandatory; thus, failure to comply renders a ballot invalid under Pennsylvania law.”
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which helped represent groups and voters who challenged the date mandate, said the ruling could mean thousands of votes won’t be counted over what it called a meaningless error.
“We strongly disagree with the panel majority’s conclusion that voters may be disenfranchised for a minor paperwork error like forgetting to write an irrelevant date on the return envelope of their mail ballot,” Ari Savitzky, a lawyer with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project who argued the appeal, said in a statement. “We are considering all of our options at this time.”
State and national Republican groups defended the date requirement, and the Republican National Committee called the decision a “crucial victory for election integrity and voter confidence.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans under an expansion of mail-in ballots enacted in 2019.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- This AI expert has 90 days to find a job — or leave the U.S.
- Untangling Exactly What Happened to Pregnant Olympian Tori Bowie
- Microsoft slashes 10,000 jobs, the latest in a wave of layoffs
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- A woman is ordered to repay $2,000 after her employer used software to track her time
- Olaplex, Sunday Riley & More: Stock Up on These Under $50 Beauty Deals Today Only
- Activists See Biden’s Day One Focus on Environmental Justice as a Critical Campaign Promise Kept
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- A Maryland TikToker raised more than $140K for an 82-year-old Walmart worker
Ranking
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- New York’s Right to ‘a Healthful Environment’ Could Be Bad News for Fossil Fuel Interests
- Two Indicators: The 2% inflation target
- Eminent Domain Lets Pipeline Developers Take Land, Pay Little, Say Black Property Owners
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Environmental Justice Leaders Look for a Focus on Disproportionately Impacted Communities of Color
- A Delta in Distress
- Kourtney Kardashian Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Husband Travis Barker
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
3 events that will determine the fate of cryptocurrencies
Ray Lewis’ Son Ray Lewis III’s Cause of Death Revealed
Maps show flooding in Vermont, across the Northeast — and where floods are forecast to continue
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Ice Dam Bursts Threaten to Increase Sunny Day Floods as Hotter Temperatures Melt Glaciers
Watch the Moment Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker Revealed They're Expecting
Groups Urge the EPA to Do Its Duty: Regulate Factory Farm Emissions